"

14.1 Offshoring, Outsourcing

Learning Objectives

  1. Be able to explain the terminology related to international HRM.
  2. Define global HRM strategies.
  3. Explain the impact of culture on HRM practices.

As you already know, this chapter is all about strategic human resource management (HRM) in a global environment.

Before we begin to discuss HRM in a global environment, it is important to define a few terms, some of which you may already know. First, offshoring is when a business relocates or moves some or part of its operations to another country. Outsourcing involves contracting with another company (onshore or offshore) to perform some business-related task. For example, a company may decide to outsource its accounting operations to a company that specializes in accounting, rather than have an in-house department perform this function. Thus a company can outsource the accounting department, and if the function operates in another country, this would also be offshoring. The focus of this chapter will be on the HRM function when work is offshored.

The Global Environment

Although the terms international, global, multinational, and transnational tend to be used interchangeably, there are distinct differences. First, a domestic market is one in which a product or service is sold only within the borders of that country. An international market is one in which a company may find that it has saturated the domestic market for the product, so it seeks out international markets in which to sell its product. Since international markets use their existing resources to expand, they do not respond to local markets as well as a global organization. A global organization is one in which a product is being sold globally, and the organization looks at the world as its market. The local responsiveness is high with a global organization. A multinational is a company that produces and sells products in other markets, unlike an international market in which products are produced domestically and then sold overseas. A transnational company is a complex organization with a corporate office, but the difference is that much of the decision making, research and development, and marketing are left up to the individual foreign market. The advantage to a transnational is the ability to respond locally to market demands and needs. The challenge in this type of organization is the ability to integrate the international offices. Coca-Cola, for example, engaged first in the domestic market, sold products in an international market, and then became multinational. The organization then realized they could obtain certain production and market efficiencies in transitioning to a transnational company, taking advantage of the local market knowledge.

Table 14.1 Differences between International, Global, Multinational, and Transnational Companies

Table 14.1 Differences between International, Global, Multinational, and Transnational Companies
Global Transnational
Centrally controlled operations Foreign offices have control over production, markets
No need for home office integration, since home office makes all decisions Integration with home office
Views the world as its market High local responsiveness
Low market responsiveness, since it is centrally controlled
International Multinational
Centrally controlled Foreign offices are viewed as subsidiaries
No need for home office integration, as home office makes all decisions Home office still has much control
Uses existing production to sell products overseas High local responsiveness
Low market responsiveness

Globalization has had far-reaching effects in business but also in strategic HRM planning. The signing of trade agreements, growth of new markets such as China, education, economics, and legal implications all impact international business.

Trade agreements have made trade easier for companies. A trade agreement is an agreement between two or more countries to reduce barriers to trade. For example, the European Union consists of twenty-seven countries (currently, with five additional countries as applicants) with the goal of eliminating trade barriers. The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) lifts barriers to trade between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The result of these trade agreements and many others is that doing business overseas is a necessity for organizations. It can result in less expensive production and more potential customers. Because of this, along with the strategic planning aspects of a global operation, human resources needs to be strategic as well. Part of this strategic process can include staffing differences, compensation differences, differences in employment law, and necessary training to prepare the workforce for a global perspective. Through the use of trade agreements and growth of new markets, such as the Chinese market, there are more places available to sell products, which means companies must be strategically positioned to sell the right product in the right market. High performance in these markets requires human capital that is able to make these types of decisions.

The level of education in the countries in which business operates is very important to the HR manager. Before a business decides to expand into a particular country, knowledge of the education, skills, and abilities of workers in that country can mean a successful venture or an unsuccessful one if the human capital needs are not met. Much of a country’s human capital depends on the importance of education to that particular country. In Denmark, for example, college educations are free and therefore result in a high percentage of well-educated people. In Somalia, with a GDP of $600 per person per year, the focus is not on education but on basic needs and survival.

Economics heavily influences HRM. Because there is economic incentive to work harder in capitalist societies, individuals may be more motivated than in communist societies. The motivation comes from workers knowing that if they work hard for something, it cannot be taken away by the government, through direct seizure or through higher taxes. Since costs of labor are one of the most important strategic considerations, understanding of compensation systems (often based on economics of the country) is an important topic. This is discussed in more detail in Section 14.3.3 “Compensation and Rewards”.

The legal system practiced in a country has a great effect on the types of compensation; union issues; how people are hired, fired, and laid off; and safety issues. Rules on discrimination, for example, are set by the country. We discuss more specifics about international laws in Section 14.3.5 “The International Labor Environment”.

Table 14.2 Top Global 100 Companies

Table 14.2 Top Global 100 Companies
Rank Company Sales ($ millions) Profits ($ millions)
1 JPMorgan Chase 179,930 41,800
2 Saudi Arabian Oil Company 589,470 156,360
3 ICBC 216,770 52,470
4 China Construction Bank 203,080 48,250
5 Agricultural Bank of China 186,140 37,920
6 Bank of America 133,840 28,620
7 Alphabet 282,850 58,590
8 ExxonMobil 393,160 61,690
9 Microsoft 207,590 69,020
10 Apple 385,100 94,320
11 Shell 365,890 43,510
12 Bank of China 158,230 33,230
13 Toyota Motor 270,490 18,500
14 Samsung Electronics 220,070 34,490
15 United Health Group 335,940 20,700
16 Ping An Insurance Group 166,370 12,640
17 Wells Fargo 108,930 14,500
18 Chevron 232,120 35,780
19 PetroChina 457,400 22,180
20 HSBC Holdings 73,980 22,190
21 TotalEnergies 257,590 21,120
21 Verizon Communications 136,190 21,590
23 Walmart 611,290 11,680
24 Citigroup 120,420 15,020
25 China Mobile 140,530 18,760
26 China Merchants Bank 72,440 20,560
27 Postal Savings Bank of China (PSBC) 82,510 12,780
28 BP 248,110 25,890
29 Volkswagen Group 293,470 15,630
30 Morgan Stanley 74,160 10,340
31 Meta Platforms 117,350 21,440
32 Sinopec 453,560 9,850
33 BNP Paribas 99,470 10,110
34 Goldman Sachs Group 79,450 10,560
35 Tencent Holdings 82,410 27,260
36 Amazon 524,900 4,290
37 Allianz 134,260 7,080
38 RBC 60,220 11,400
39 Pfizer 92,950 29,040
40 Johnson & Johnson 96,310 12,720
41 Deutsche Telekom 120,720 8,410
42 Mercedes-Benz Group 158,780 15,550
43 TD Bank Group 56,720 11,680
44 Taiwan Semiconductor 75,030 33,570
45 Reliance Industries 109,430 8,300
46 BMW Group 154,250 11,670
47 LVMH Mo Hennessy Louis Vuitton 83,220 14,800
48 AXA Group 110,920 6,830
49 Santander 87,740 10,090
50 Nestlé 98,870 9,710
51 Comcast 120,110 5,660
52 Equinor 141,920 28,980
53 Bank of Communications 78,290 12,900
54 Alibaba Group 128,260 4,460
55 Procter & Gamble 80,970 14,320
56 Nippon Telegraph & Tel 91,767 9,000
57 Sony 85,150 6,920
58 Petrobras 124,170 36,470
59 Glencore International 254,930 16,980
60 Industrial Bank 59,080 12,970
61 Stellantis 188,750 17,660
62 China Life Insurance 124,430 4,870
63 American Express 59,290 7,180
64 General Electric 74,020 8,560
65 CVS Health 331,170 3,970
66 China State Construction Engineering 303,780 7,700
67 The Home Depot 157,400 17,110
68 Cigna 182,800 6,750
69 Tesla 86,030 11,790
70 General Motors 160,740 9,390
71 CITIC 98,480 9,640
72 Anheuser-Busch InBev 57,830 6,060
73 Merck & Co 57,090 13,030
74 AbbVie 56,740 7,540
75 Mitsubishi 161,020 9,490
76 Roche Holding 66,260 13,010
77 State Bank of India 56,540 5,990
78 Elevance Health 160,670 6,210
79 Raytheon Technologies 68,570 5,540
80 Oracle 47,960 8,370
81 Eni 132,380 13,120
82 PepsiCo 88,050 6,580
83 ConocoPhillips 75,200 15,840
84 Bank of Montreal 37,560 8,290
85 CNOOC 59,080 21,090
86 Sumitomo Mitsui Financial 41,540 6,450
87 Walt Disney 84,070 3,320
88 Bank of Nova Scotia 40,240 6,880
89 Sanofi 45,190 8,800
90 BHP Group 59,950 19,510
91 Mitsubishi UFL Financial 60,220 3,070
92 UBS 39,890 6,550
93 Cisco Systems 53,160 11,300
94 Novartis 50,950 7,000
95 United Parcel Service 98,550 10,780
96 Coca-Cola 43,310 9,870
97 Siemens 77,300 3,740
98 Itau Unibanco Holding 53,170 5,750
99 Costco Wholesale 234,390 6,050
100 CommonWealth Bank 25,330 6,960
Source: Adapted from Fortune 500 List 2023, https://www.forbes.com/lists/global2000/?sh=3937ff525ac0 (accessed April 11, 2024).

Global HR Trends

Howard Wallack, director of Global Member programs for the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), talks about some of the global HR trends and gives tips on how to deal with these trends from the HR perspective.

HRM Global Strategies

When discussing HRM from the global perspective, there are many considerations. Culture, language, management styles, and laws would all be considerations before implementing HRM strategies. Beechler argued that for multinational companies, identifying the best HRM processes for the entire organization isn’t the goal, but rather finding the best fit between the firm’s external environment (i.e., the law) and the company’s overall strategy, HRM policies, and implementation of those policies[1]. To this end, Adler and Bartholomew developed a set of transnational competencies that are required for business to thrive in a global business environment[2]. A transnational scope means that HRM decisions can be made based on an international scope; that is, HRM strategic decisions can be made from the global perspective rather than a domestic one. With this HRM strategy, decisions take into consideration the needs of all employees in all countries in which the company operates. The concern is the ability to establish standards that are fair for all employees, regardless of which country they operate in. A transnational representation means that the composition of the firm’s managers and executives should be a multinational one. A transnational process, then, refers to the extent to which ideas that contribute to the organization come from a variety of perspectives and ideas from all countries in which the organization operates. Ideally, all company processes will be based on the transnational approach. This approach means that multicultural understanding is taken into consideration, and rather than trying to get international employees to fit within the scope of the domestic market, a more holistic approach to HRM is used. Using a transnational approach means that HRM policies and practices are a crucial part of a successful business, because they can act as mechanisms for coordination and control for the international operations[3]. In other words, HRM can be the glue that sticks many independent operations together.

Before we look at HRM strategy on the global level, let’s discuss some of the considerations before implementing HRM systems.

Culture as a Major Aspect of HRM Overseas

Culture is a key component to managing HRM on a global scale. Understanding culture but also appreciating cultural differences can help the HRM strategy be successful in any country. Geert Hofstede, a researcher in the area of culture, developed a list of five cultural dimensions that can help define how cultures are different[4].

The first dimension of culture is individualism-collectivism. In this dimension, Hofstede describes the degree to which individuals are integrated into groups. For example, in the United States, we are an individualist society; that is, each person looks after him- or herself and immediate family. There is more focus on individual accomplishments as opposed to group accomplishments. In a collective society, societies are based on cohesive groups, whether it be family groups or work groups. As a result, the focus is on the good of the group, rather than the individual.

Figure 14.1Fist bumps and elbow bumps Lewes FC Women v London Bees (50288949288)
One of the factors of culture is nonverbal language, such as the use of handshakes, kissing, or bowing. Credit: James Boyes from UK, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Power distance, Hofstede’s second dimension, refers to the extent to which the less powerful members of organizations accept that power is not distributed equally. For example, some societies may seek to eliminate differences in power and wealth, while others prefer a higher power distance. From an HRM perspective, these differences may become clear when employees are asked to work in cross-functional teams. A Danish manager may have no problem taking advice from employees because of the low power distance of his culture, but a Saudi Arabian manager may have issues with an informal relationship with employees, because of the high power distance.

Uncertainty avoidance refers to how a society tolerates uncertainty. Countries that focus more on avoidance tend to minimize the uncertainty and therefore have stricter laws, rules, and other safety measures. Countries that are more tolerant of uncertainty tend to be more easygoing and relaxed. Consider the situation in which a company in the United States decides to apply the same HRM strategy to its operations in Peru. The United States has an uncertainty avoidance score of 46, which means the society is more comfortable with uncertainty. Peru has a high uncertainty avoidance, with a score of 87, indicating the society’s low level of tolerance for uncertainty. Let’s suppose a major part of the pay structure is bonuses. Would it make sense to implement this same compensation plan in international operations? Probably not.

Masculinity and femininity refers to the distribution of emotional roles between genders, and which gender norms are accepted by society. For example, in countries that are focused on femininity, traditional “female” values such as caring are more important than, say, showing off. The implications to HRM are huge. For example, Sweden has a more feminine culture, which is demonstrated in its management practices. A major component in managers’ performance appraisals is to provide mentoring to employees. A manager coming from a more masculine culture may not be able to perform this aspect of the job as well, or he or she may take more practice to be able to do it.

The last dimension is long-term–short-term orientation, which refers to the society’s time horizons. A long-term orientation would focus on future rewards for work now, persistence, and ordering of relationships by status. A short-term orientation may focus on values related to the past and present such as national pride or fulfillment of current obligations. We can see HRM dimensions with this orientation in succession planning, for example. In China the person getting promoted might be the person who has been with the company the longest, whereas in short-term orientation countries like the United States, promotion is usually based on merit. An American working for a Chinese company may get upset to see someone promoted who doesn’t do as good of a job, just because they have been there longer, and vice versa.

Based on Hofstede’s dimensions, you can see the importance of culture to development of an international HRM strategy. To utilize a transnational strategy, all these components should be factored into all decisions such as hiring, compensation, and training. Since culture is a key component in HRM, it is important now to define some other elements of culture.

Table 14.3 Examples of Countries and Hofstede’s Dimensions

Table 14.3 Examples of Countries and Hofstede’s Dimensions
Country Power Distance Individualism/Collectivism Masculinity/Femininity Uncertainty Avoidance Long/Short Term Orientation
New Zealand 22 79 58 49 30
UK 35 89 66 35 25
United States 40 91 62 46 29
Japan 54 46 95 92 80
Taiwan 58 17 45 69 87
Zambia 64 27 41 52 25
India 77 48 56 40 61
China 80 20 66 40 118
Philippines 94 32 64 44 19
Chile 63 23 28 86 (this dimension was only studied in 23 countries)
Power distance: Refers to the comfort level of power differences among society members. A lower score shows greater equality among levels of society, such as New Zealand.
Individualism/collectivism: A high ranking here, such as the United States, means there is more concern for the individualistic aspects of society as opposed to collectivism. Countries with high scores on individualism means the people tend to be more self-reliant.
Masculinity/femininity: A lower score may indicate lower levels of differentiation between genders. A lower score, such as Chile, may also indicate a more openly nurturing society.
Uncertainty avoidance: Refers to the tolerance for uncertainty. A high score, such as Japan’s, means there is lower tolerance for uncertainty, so rules, laws, policies, and regulations are implemented.
Long/short term orientation: Refers to thrift and perseverance, overcoming obstacles with time (long-term orientation), such as China, versus tradition, social obligations.

Culture refers to the socially accepted ways of life within a society. Some of these components might include language, norms, values, rituals, and material culture such as art, music, and tools used in that culture. Language is perhaps one of the most obvious parts of culture. Often language can define a culture and of course is necessary to be able to do business. HRM considerations for language might include something as simple as what language (the home country or host country) will documents be sent in? Is there a standard language the company should use within its communications?

Human Resource in Action

Human Resource Recall

Which component of culture do you think is the most important in HRM? Why?

Key Takeaways

  • Offshoring is when a business relocates or moves part of its operations to a country different from the one it currently operates in.
  • Outsourcing is when a company contracts with another company to do some work for another. This can occur domestically or in an offshoring situation.
  • Domestic market means that a product is sold only within the country that the business operates in.
  • An international market means that an organization is selling products in other countries, while a multinational one means that not only are products being sold in a country, but operations are set up and run in a country other than where the business began.
  • The goal of any HRM strategy is to be transnational, which consists of three components. First, the transnational scope involves the ability to make decisions on a global level rather than a domestic one. Transnational representation means that managers from all countries in which the business operates are involved in business decisions. Finally, a transnational process means that the organization can involve a variety of perspectives, rather than only a domestic one.
  • Part of understanding HRM internationally is to understand culture. Hofstede developed five dimensions of culture. First, there is the individualism-collectivism aspect, which refers to the tendency of a country to focus on individuals versus the good of the group.
  • The second Hofstede dimension is power distance, that is, how willing people are to accept unequal distributions of power.
  • The third is uncertainty avoidance, which means how willing the culture is to accept not knowing future outcomes.
  • A masculine-feminine dimension refers to the acceptance of traditional male and female characteristics.
  • Finally, Hofstede focused on a country’s long-term orientation versus short-term orientation in decision making.
  • Other aspects of culture include norms, values, rituals, and material culture. Norms are the generally accepted way of doing things, and values are those things the culture finds important. Every country has its own set of rituals for ceremonies but also for everyday interactions. Material culture refers to the material goods, such as art, the culture finds important.
  • Other HRM aspects to consider when entering a foreign market are the economics, the law, and the level of education and skill level of the human capital in that country.

Exercises

  1. Visit http://www.geert-hofstede.com/ and view the cultural dimensions of three countries. Then write a paragraph comparing and contrasting all three.

  1. Beechler, S., Vladimir Pucik, John Stephan, and Nigel Campbell, “The Transnational Challenge: Performance and Expatriate Presence in the Overseas Affiliates of Japanese MNCs,” in Japanese Firms in Transition: Responding to the Globalization Challenge, Advances in International Management, vol. 17, ed. Tom Roehl and Allan Bird (Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, 2004), 215–42.
  2. Adler, N. J. and Susan Bartholomew, “Managing Globally Competent People,” Executive 6, no. 3 (1992): 52–65.
  3. Pudelko, M. and Anne-Wil Harzing, “Country-of-Origin, Localization, or Dominance Effect? An Empirical Investigation of HRM Practices in Foreign Subsidiaries,” Human Resource Management 46, no. 4 (2007): 535–59.
  4. Hofstede, G., Cultural Dimensions website, accessed April 11, 2024, http://www.geert-hofstede.com/.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Introduction to Human Resource Management Copyright © 2024 by Dylan Polkinghorne is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book